1. Safeguarding Children Abused through Domestic Violence |
Contents
1. |
Introduction to Safeguarding Children Abused through Domestic Violence |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
2. |
||
|
2.1 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
3. |
||
4. |
||
|
4.1 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
4.3 |
The impact of domestic violence on mothers and their ability to parent |
|
4.4 |
|
5. |
||
|
5.1 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
6. |
||
|
6.1 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
7. |
Enabling disclosure (LA children's social care, health and education/schools professionals) |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
7.2 |
|
8. |
||
|
8.1 |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
8.4 |
Agency / community or other group responsibilities in enabling disclosure and/or recognition |
9. |
||
|
9.1 |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
9.3 |
Factors which increased vulnerability / risk and appropriate interventions |
|
9.4 |
Thresholds and interventions - common assessment framework (CAF) |
|
9.5 |
|
|
9.6 |
Responding to domestic violence where there are no children in the household |
10. |
||
11. |
||
12. |
||
13. |
||
14. |
||
|
14.1 |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
14.5 |
|
15. |
Contact (LA children's social care, specialist agencies and CAFCASS) |
|
16. |
||
17. |
||
|
17.1 |
|
|
17.2 |
|
| 18. | ||
|
||
|
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
AcknowledgementsThe London Safeguarding Children Board thanks Barnardos for providing the basis for this procedure and Barnet and Hammersmith and Fulham Safeguarding Children Boards for piloting it and proofing it for implementation. |
1. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 |
Introduction |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1.1 |
The issue of children living with domestic violence is now recognised as a matter for concern in its own right by both government and key children's services agencies. The link between child physical abuse and domestic violence is high, with estimates ranging between 30% to 66% depending upon the study (Hester et al [2000]; Edleson [1999]; Humphreys and Thiara [2002]). In 2002, nearly three quarters of children subject of a child protection plan) lived in households where domestic violence occurs (Department of Health [2002]). |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1.2 |
All the five key outcomes for children identified in Every Child Matters can be adversely affected for a child living with domestic violence and abuse - the impact is usually on every aspect of a child's life. The impact of domestic violence and abuse on an individual child will vary according to the child's resilience and the strengths and weaknesses of their particular circumstances. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1.3 |
The three central imperatives of any intervention for children living with domestic violence are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2 |
How to use this procedure |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2.1 |
This procedure is for use by all professionals (the term includes unqualified managers, staff and volunteers) who have contact with children and with adults who are parents / carers, and who therefore have responsibilities for safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2.2 |
Sections of this procedure are for certain professionals only. These are indicated in the section headings (e.g. section 7 'for LA children's social care, health and education / schools professionals', and section 15 'LA children's social care, specialist agencies and CAFCASS' and the sections for specific agencies such as police, health etc.). |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2.3 |
This procedure should be read in conjunction with the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 |
Definition |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.1 |
Domestic violence is defined by the Home Office as: 'Any incident of threatening behaviour, violence or abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial or emotional) between adults who are or have been intimate partners or family members, regardless of gender or sexuality'. The main characteristic of domestic violence is that the behaviour is intentional and is calculated to exercise power and control within a relationship. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.2 |
Examples of these behaviours are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.3 |
A term which is increasingly used to refer to domestic violence is 'domestic abuse', which has the advantage that it reflects the non-physical abuses referred to above. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.4 |
See also section 5.3, Animal Abuse and Links to Abuse of Children and Vulnerable Adults, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.5 |
Agencies should apply these procedures to all circumstances of domestic violence. Most domestic violence is perpetrated by men against women, and this procedure provides guidance on safeguarding the children who, through being in households / relationships, are aware of or targeted as part of the violence. This procedure refers to the victim/survivor as female and the abuser as male as this reflects the majority of cases where there are child protection concerns. However, agencies should apply the guidance to all situations of domestic violence. Domestic violence can also be perpetrated by women against men, within same sex relationships, and between any other family members. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.6 |
This procedure uses the term 'mothers' to describe mothers, prospective mothers and adults with ongoing primary caring responsibilities for children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.7 |
See Appendix 3, Key Facts about Domestic Violence for the prevalence and profile of domestic violence in the UK. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.2 |
Forced marriage and honour-based violence |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.2.1 |
Children and young people can be subjected to domestic abuses perpetrated in order to force them into marriage or to 'punish' him/her for 'bringing dishonour on the family'. Whilst honour based violence can culminate in the death of the victim, this is not always the case. The child or young person may be subjected over a long period to a variety of different abusive behaviours ranging in severity. The abuse is often carried out by several members of a family and may, therefore, increase the child's sense of powerlessness and be harder for professionals to identify and respond to. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.2.2 |
London procedures for responding to forced marriage and honour-based violence are available as section 5.16, Forced Marriage of a Child and section 5.20, Honour-Based Violence, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). These sections are included in this procedure in Appendix 2. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 |
All professionals should understand the following issues that children and their mothers may face, and take these into consideration when trying to help them:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
3.2 |
See also section 5, Children in Specific Circumstances in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
4. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 |
The impact of domestic violence on children |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.1 |
The risks to children living with domestic violence include:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.2 |
Children who witness domestic violence suffer emotional and psychological maltreatment (Note: Section 31 Children Act 1989: impairment suffered from seeing or hearing the ill treatment of another [amended by the Adoption and Children Act 2002]). They tend to have low self-esteem and experience increased levels of anxiety, depression, anger and fear, aggressive and violent behaviours, including bullying, lack of conflict resolution skills, lack of empathy for others and poor peer relationships, poor school performance, anti-social behaviour, pregnancy, alcohol and substance misuse, self blame, hopelessness, shame and apathy, post traumatic stress disorder - symptoms such as hyper-vigilance, nightmares and intrusive thoughts - images of violence, insomnia, enuresis and over protectiveness of their mother and/or siblings. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.3 |
The impact of domestic violence on children is similar to the effects of any other abuse or trauma and will depend upon such factors as:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4.2.1 |
30% of domestic violence begins or escalates during pregnancy (Note: Gynneth Lewis and James Drife, Why Mothers Die 2000-2002 - Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom [CEMACH, 2005]), and it has been identified as a prime cause of miscarriage or still-birth (Gillian Mezey, "Domestic Violence in Pregnancy" in S. Bewley, J. Friend, and G. Mezey (ed.) Violence against women [Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1997]), premature birth, foetal psychological damage from the effect of abuse on the mother's hormone levels, foetal physical injury and foetal death (Note: Robert Anda, Vincent Felitti, J. Douglas Bremner, John Walker, Charles Whitfield, Bruce Perry, Shanta Dube, Wayne Giles, "The enduring effects of childhood abuse and related experiences: a convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology", in European Archives of Psychiatric and Clinical Neuroscience, 256 [3] 174 - 186 [2006 - available online at The Child Trauma Academy]). The mother may be prevented from seeking or receiving proper ante-natal or post-natal care. In addition, if the mother is being abused this may affect her attachment to her child, more so if the pregnancy is a result of rape by her partner. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.2.2 |
See also section 6.8, Pre-Birth Referral and Assessment, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.1 |
The child/ren are often reliant on their mother as the only source of good parenting, as the abusive partner will have significantly diminished ability to parent well. This is particularly so because domestic violence very often co-exists with high levels of punishment, the misuse of power and a failure of appropriate self-control by the abusive partner. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.2 |
Many mothers seek help because they are concerned about the risk domestic violence poses to their child/ren. However, domestic violence may diminish a mother's capacity to protect her child/ren and mothers can become so preoccupied with their own survival within the relationship that they are unaware of the effect on their child/ren. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.3 |
Mothers subjected to domestic violence have described a number of physical effects, including frequent accommodation moves, economic limitations, isolation from social networks and, in some cases, being physically prevented from fulfilling their parenting role by the abuser. The psychological impact can include:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.4 |
Mothers subjected to domestic violence can experience sexually transmitted diseases and/or multiple terminations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.3.5 |
Domestic violence contributes directly to the breakdown of mental health, and mothers experiencing domestic violence are very likely to suffer from depression and other mental health difficulties leading to self-harm, attempted suicide and/or substance misuse. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
4.4.1 |
Professionals are often very optimistic about men's parenting skills (Hester and Radford [1996]), whilst scrutinising the mother's parenting in much greater detail. However, research (Holden and Ritchie [America, 1991]) has found that the abusive partners had inferior parenting skills, including being:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
See also section 5.32, Parental Mental Illness and section 5.34, Parents who Misuse Substances, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 |
Mothers |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.1 |
Mothers who experience domestic violence are more likely to use prescription drugs, alcohol and illegal substances. (Note: J. Jacobs, The Links between Substance Misuse and Domestic Violence: Current Knowledge and Debates [London: Alcohol Concern, 1998]) |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.2 |
For a mother experiencing domestic violence, alcohol and drugs can represent a wide range of coping and safety strategies. Mothers may have started using legal drugs prescribed to alleviate symptoms of a violent relationship. Mothers may turn to alcohol and drugs as a form of self-medication and relief from the pain, fear, isolation and guilt that are associated with domestic violence. Alcohol and drug use can help eliminate or reduce these feelings and therefore become part of how she copes with the abuse. (Note: The Stella Project, Separate Issues Shared Solutions - Report from the Launch of the Stella Project [Greater London Alcohol and Drug Alliance and Greater London Domestic Violence Project, 2003]) |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.3 |
Mothers can be coerced and manipulated into alcohol and drug use. Abusers may often introduce their partner to alcohol or drug use to increase her dependence on him and to control her behaviour (Ibid.). Furthermore, any attempts by the mother to stop her alcohol or drug use are threatening to the controlling partner and some abusive men will actively encourage mothers to leave treatment. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.4 |
Mothers in abusive relationships are also at risk of sexual exploitation. Mothers working in prostitution may be subjected to domestic violence through their relationship with their 'pimps'; these relationships will invariably be based on power, control or the use of violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.5 |
The double stigma associated with being both a victim of domestic violence as well as having a substance use problem may compound the difficulties of help-seeking, particularly for black and minority ethnic mothers. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.6 |
Mental health problems such as depression, trauma symptoms, suicide attempts and self-harm are frequently 'symptoms of abuse' and need to be addressed alongside the issues of substance use and domestic violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.7 |
The relationship between a mother's alcohol and drug use and/or mental health problems and her experiences of domestic violence may not (or not all) be linked. Assessment and interventions for these mothers therefore need to be conducted separately, although as part of the same care plan, and at the same time. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.2.1 |
Men who abuse may use their own or their partners' alcohol or drug use as an excuse for their violence. An abusive partner may threaten to expose a mother (or teenage girl)'s use. He may be her supplier and he may increase her dependence on him by increasing her dependence on drugs. (Note: Holly Taylor, Making the links between domestic violence and substance misuse - an evaluation of service provision in Tower Hamlets [Tower Hamlets Domestic Violence Team, 2003]) |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.2.2 |
Despite the fact that alcohol, drugs and violence to women often coexist, there is no evidence to suggest a causal link. In addition, no evidence exists to support a "loss of control caused by intoxication" explanation for violence - research and case examples show that abusive partners exert a huge amount of power and control regardless of intoxication. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.2.3 |
Even when physical assaults are only committed whilst intoxicated, abusive partners are likely to be committing non-physical forms of abuse when sober. It should never be assumed that by working with an abusive partner's substance use the violent behaviour will also be reduced. In fact, the violence may increase when substance use is treated. Similarly, it should not be assumed that treating a domestic abuser's mental ill health will necessarily reduce their violent behaviour - again, the violence may increase. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.2.4 |
Therefore, work with an abusive partner should comprise separate assessments and interventions for violence, substance misuse and/or mental ill health. The intervention outcomes are more likely to be positive if the violence, substance use and/or mental ill health are addressed at the same time. |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 |
Barriers to disclosure for mothers |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1.1 |
There are many reasons why a mother will be unwilling or unable to disclose that she is experiencing domestic violence. Usually it is because she fears that the disclosure (and accepting help) will be worse than the current situation and could be fatal. A mother may:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
6.1.2 |
Some women are simply not ready. It is therefore important to keep asking the question. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.1 |
Children affected by domestic violence often find disclosure difficult or go to great lengths to hide it. This could be because the child is:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
7. |
Enabling disclosure (LA children's social care, health and education/schools professionals) |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1 |
Enabling disclosure for children and mothers |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1.1 |
Where a professional is concerned about / has recognised the signs of domestic violence (see Section 8, Responding to Domestic Violence), the professional can approach the subject with a child or a mother with a framing question. That is, the question should be 'framed' so that the subject is not suddenly and awkwardly introduced, e.g.:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1.2 |
The professional should explain the limits of confidentiality and his/her safeguarding responsibilities. For more information about confidentiality and sharing information, please see section 3, Sharing Information in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1.3 |
If the child or mother says s/he has been abused, the professional should ask clarification questions such as those set out in Appendix 4, Communicating with a child and Appendix 5, Clarification questions for a mother. |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.1.4 |
Professionals should not press the child for answers, instead:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
7.2.1 |
Professionals should be alert to and prepared to receive and clarify a disclosure about domestic violence from an abusive partner / father. Professionals may have contact with a man on his own (e.g. a GP or substance misuse or mental health service) or in the context of a family (e.g. to a school, accident and emergency unit, maternity service or LA children's social care). He may present with a problem such as substance misuse, stress, depression or psychosis or aggressive or offending behaviour - without reference to abusive behaviour in his household / relationship. |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.2.2 |
Professionals should consult section 10, Working with Unco-operative Families in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007) before seeking to enable or clarify a disclosure from an abusive partner, taking into account their own safety and the safety of any child/ren and their mother. |
||||||||||||||||||||
7.2.3 |
If the man states that domestic violence is an issue, or the professional suspects that it is, the professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
7.2.4 |
The professional should act to safeguard the child/ren and/or their mother by:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
7.2.5 |
Professionals should be aware that the majority of abusive partners will deny or minimise domestic abuse. See also section 17, Abusive Partners/Children and Appendix 10, Working with Abusive Partners. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
8.1 |
Professionals' responsibilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1.1 |
Professionals will work with many women who are experiencing domestic violence and have not disclosed. Research suggests that women usually experience an average of 35 incidents before reporting it to the police (Yearnshire [1997]). |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1.2 |
Professionals should offer all children and women, accompanied or not, the opportunity of being seen alone (including in all assessments) with a female practitioner, wherever practicable, and asked whether they are experiencing or have previously experienced domestic violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1.3 |
Professionals in all agencies are in a position to identify or receive a disclosure about domestic violence. Professionals should be alert to the signs that a child or mother may be experiencing domestic violence, or that a father / partner may be perpetrating domestic violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1.4 |
Professionals should never assume that somebody else will take care of the domestic violence issues. This may be the child, mother or abusing partner's first or only disclosure or contact with services in circumstances which allow for safeguarding action. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1.5 |
Professionals must ensure that their attempts to identify domestic violence and their response to recognition or disclosure of domestic violence do not trigger an escalation of violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.1.6 |
In particular, professionals should keep in mind that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
8.2.1 |
Professionals receiving information about domestic violence should explain that priority will be given to ensuring that the child/ren and their mother's safety is not compromised through the sharing of information. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.2.2 |
If there is concern about the risk of significant harm to the child/ren, then every professional's overriding duty is to protect the child/ren. See section 3, Sharing Information and section 6, Referral and Assessment in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.2.3 |
Professionals also have a duty to protect the mother and should do so under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, which allows responsible authorities to share information where a crime has been committed or is going to be committed. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
8.3.1 |
Professionals in all agencies are likely to become aware of domestic violence through:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
8.3.2 |
Information from the public, family or community members must be taken sufficiently seriously by professionals in statutory and voluntary agencies. Recent research evidence indicates that failure to do so has been a contributory factor at least two-thirds of cases where a child has been seriously harmed or died in London. |
||||||||||||||||||||
8.3.4 |
Information could also come in the form of information shared by another agency or group, which a professional decides to respond proactively to because s/he becomes concerned that the agency or group which shared the information is not responding appropriately to support the child/ren and/or their mother. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
8.4.1 |
Agencies / community and other groups should create a supportive environment by ensuring that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
8.4.2 |
It is good practice to incorporate routine enquiry about domestic violence into health, social care and police assessments. Routine enquiry has been effective in increasing disclosure, and evidence suggests that victims of domestic violence are more likely to disclose if they are asked directly. Pregnancy is an opportune time to ask women about domestic violence as many mothers say that it made them think seriously about the future and how their children might be affected by the violence in the long-term. (Mezey and Brewley [2000]) |
||||||||||||||||||||
9. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
9.1 |
Information gathering and disclosure |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.1.1 |
Professionals should validate and support children and mothers who disclose by:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.1.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
9.1.3 |
Professionals in agencies other than LA children's social care, health and education / schools should only attempt to enable disclosure, or further disclosure, if they have been trained to do so and are supported by their agency's policies, procedures and safeguarding children supervisory arrangements. If these requirements are met, the professional should see Section 7. Enabling disclosure (LA children's social care, health and education/schools professionals), above. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.1.4 |
Whether or not a child or mother discloses, when a professional becomes aware of domestic violence in a family, in order to assess and attend to immediate safety issues for the child/ren, mother and professional, the professional should establish:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.1.5 |
The professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.3.1 |
Babies under 12 months old are particularly vulnerable to violence. Where there is domestic violence in families with a child under 12 months old (including an unborn child), even if the child was not present, any single incident of domestic violence will fall within scale 4. Professionals should make a referral to LA children's social care, in line with section 6, Referral and Assessment in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007), section 6.4.4. Section 47 / initial assessment indicator table and section 7, Child Protection Enquiries in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.3.2 |
If there are children under the age of seven in the family, this could raise the level of risk as young children are more vulnerable because they do not have the ability to implement safety strategies and are dependent on their mothers to protect them. In cases such as this, the characteristics of the child and situation which are 'protective' need to be carefully considered. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.3.3 |
If there is a child or a mother who has special needs, the risk of harm to the child, the mother and other children in the family is increased because the child or mother may not have the ability to implement an effective safety strategy. If the mother is a vulnerable adult, professionals should follow their local Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) procedure. (Note: Each local authority will have their own procedure for the protection of vulnerable adults. For a generic summary of the contents, see the London Safeguarding Children Board website) |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.3.4 |
If the child/ren or mothers are from a black or minority ethnic community they may be experiencing additional vulnerabilities. See section 3. Families with additional vulnerabilities, above. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.3.5 |
Violence directed towards a mother may draw attention away from the fact that a child in the family may be being sexually or physically abused or targeted in some other way (e.g. the child could be the focus of paranoid thoughts). See section 4, Recognition and Response and section 5 - Children in specific circumstances (particularly section 5.32. Parental mental ill health) in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.3.6 |
Professionals should also assure themselves that a child is not perpetrating abuse towards other family members. See section 5.20, Harming Others in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.4.1 |
Scale 1 - moderate risk of harm to the child/ren identifiedThreshold scale 1 assesses the potential risk of harm to the child/ren as moderate. A child in this situation will have additional needs - as defined within the Common Assessment Framework (CAF). The child/ren and their mother are likely to need family support interventions which can be offered by the agency itself or by another single agency. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.4.2 |
The professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.4.3 |
Scale 2 - moderate to serious risk of harm to the child/ren identifiedThreshold scale 2. assesses the potential risk of harm to the child/ren as moderate to serious. A child in this situation will have additional needs, as defined within the Common Assessment Framework (CAF). The child/ren and their mother are likely to need family support interventions offered by more than one agency, which are co-ordinated by a Lead Professional. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.4.4 |
The professional should follow the procedures at 9.4.2 a) - c), e) and f). In addition, the professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.5.1 |
Scale 3 - safeguarding, serious risk of harm to the child/ren identifiedThreshold scale 3. assesses the potential risk of harm to the child/ren as serious. In threshold scale 3, protection factors are limited and the children may be suffering or be at risk of suffering Significant Harm. Intervention and support for the child/ren and their mother will require LA children's social care planning, via a section 17 Children in Need assessment. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.5.2 |
The professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.5.3 |
See appendix 6. Multi-agency risk assessment conferencing (MARAC). |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.5.4 |
Scale 4 - initiate child protection procedures, severe risk of harm to the child/ren identifiedThreshold scale 4. assesses the domestic violence as severe with increased concern regarding children's well-being due to additional contributory risk factors. In threshold scale 4, protective factors are extremely limited and the threshold of Significant Harm is reached. |
||||||||||||||||||||
9.5.5 |
The professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.5.6 |
See appendix 6, Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferencing (MARAC). |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.6.1 |
Having confirmed that there are no children in the household, the professional may consider the following:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
9.6.2 |
See Appendix 6, Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferencing (MARAC). |
||||||||||||||||||||
10. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
10.1 |
If the police receive a telephone call or other contact from a child requesting help in relation to domestic violence, the police must take immediate protective action and follow up with a child protection referral to LA children's social care in line with section 6, Referral and Assessment, London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.2 |
Police may receive contact from a domestic violence victim, third party or abusive partner in several ways, for example; a telephone call (emergency or non-emergency line), direct enquiry at the station, an approach in the street, via a multi-agency meeting or partner referral. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.3 |
The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) will investigate all incidents of domestic violence. Generally, in the first instance, this will be done by an initial investigating officer (IIO) - a police officer or a domestic violence trained member of police staff. They will complete a form 124D, the MPS's own domestic violence incident report book in most circumstances (rapes and murders generally being the exceptions). This is a risk identification, assessment and management tool, as well as being an aide memoir for evidential gathering purposes and a signpost to support agencies. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.4 |
Police officers should use the SPECSS+ (CUSSCAAM) Tool (Note: The SPECSS + [CUSSCAAM] Tool can be accessed on The London Safeguarding Children Board Website) to assess risk and inform immediate appropriate safety planning measures to ensure the safety of the victim and their children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.5 |
The SPECSS+ (CUSSCAAM) Tool includes a part 1 risk identifier as used by Initial Investigating Officers and a part 2 risk assessment that is used for medium and high risk cases. The IIO (and later the Investigating Officer) will make an assessment of risk as either:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
10.6 |
If children are part of the family composition where domestic violence is reported, a MERLIN report of a child coming to notice must be completed in all cases. The information on the Merlin will be shared with LA children's social care and may drive further information sharing and case conference discussion. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.7 |
Initial investigating officers will record all the children who live in the household regardless of whether they are direct witnesses to the incident. The officers will detail:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
10.8 |
A section sergeant or duty inspector will be responsible for supervising the initial investigation to ensure that there are no significant gaps within the investigation and an appropriate risk assessment and management plan is in place. If this is not the case, they will direct the IIO to take further action to rectify any deficiencies in the initial investigation. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.9 |
The details of the investigation are recorded on the Crime Reporting Information System (CRIS), along with the appropriate initial risk assessment. All CRIS reports will be screened into the relevant unit for further investigation. In the majority of cases, this will be the local Community Safety Unit (CSU). The exceptions being:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
10.10 |
The CSU's remit is that of domestic violence, hate crime and vulnerable adult abuse investigation. The primary aim of the CSU is to investigate the incident and identify, arrest and prosecute the perpetrator. Where a criminal prosecution of a perpetrator is deemed inappropriate, they will identify and pursue alternative courses of action in consultation with their partner agencies to stop the violence and make victims and their children safer. The officers within the unit are mostly detectives who have received specialised domestic violence training. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.11 |
As appropriate, the domestic violence CRIS reports will be passed to the CSU for further investigation. A Detective Sergeant will review the report and make an assessment, based on whether the case is medium or high risk, as to whether a further part 2 risk assessment needs to be completed. They will also set an investigative strategy before assigning the crime to an investigating officer (IO). |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.12 |
The IO will not only investigate the crime and manage the risk to victim and children, they are expected to signpost the victim to appropriate local domestic violence support agencies. Many boroughs now have access to Independent Domestic Violence Advocates (IDVA) or DV Crises Intervention Workers who will work closely with CSUs and individual IOs to support the victim and their children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.13 |
Once they have collated all the available evidence, the IO will speak to the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service), either locally or CPS direct if out of office hours. The relevant prosecutor will then make one of the following decisions:
If the IO feels the decision made by the CPS is inappropriate, there is a dispute resolution process to resolve disagreements between MPS and CPS. |
||||||||||||||||||||
10.14 |
A CSU Detective Inspector (DI) will oversee all domestic violence investigations. If the case is deemed high-risk, consideration will be given by the DI to referring the case to a Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) if available on their borough. The purpose of the MARAC is to plan intensive appropriate and proportional support for victims and their children and effectively manage their safety using the skills and resources of a variety of agencies. |
||||||||||||||||||||
11. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
11.1 |
LA children's social care should respond to a referral of a child at risk of domestic violence in line with this procedure and the relevant sections of the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
11.2 |
Social workers will assess the child and their family using the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (DH, 2000) and the risk assessment matrix (see Appendix 1, Risk Assessment Matrix), taking into account such factors as the:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
12. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
12.1 |
Health service professionals should respond to domestic violence in line with this procedure, the relevant sections of the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007) and the government guidance: Responding to domestic abuse: A handbook for health professionals (DH, 2005). |
||||||||||||||||||||
13. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
13.1 |
LA education / schools professionals should respond to domestic violence in line with this procedure and the relevant sections of the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
14. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
14.1 |
Safety planning |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.1.1 |
Safety planning for mothers and children is key to all interventions to safeguard children in domestic violence situations. All immediate and subsequent assessments of risk to child/ren and their mother should include a judgement on the family's existing safety planning. Emergency safety plans should be in place whilst assessments, referrals and interventions are being progressed. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.1.2 |
In some cases which reach threshold scale 4 (severe risk of harm to the child/ren), the emergency safety plan / strategy should be for the child/ren and, if possible, the mother, not to have contact with the abuser. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.1.3 |
Professionals in agencies other than police, LA children's social care, health and education / schools professionals should only attempt to agree detailed safety planning with a child or mother if they have been trained to do so and are supported by their agency's policies, procedures and safeguarding children supervisory arrangements. If these requirements are met, the professional should follow section 14.2, Safety Planning with Mothers below. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
14.2.1 |
Professionals should use the pro forma in Appendix 8, Safety Planning with Women to help the mother develop a safety plan. Safety planning needs to begin with an understanding of the mother's views of the risks to herself and her child/ren and the strategies she has in place to address them. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
14.3.1 |
A key question is whether a mother plans to remain in the relationship with the abusive partner. If she does, professionals should assess the risk of harm to the children using the Risk Identification Matrix, to decide whether the risks of harm to the children can be managed with such a plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.3.2 |
If the mother is choosing not to separate, then the abusive partner will need to be involved in the assessment and intervention. Professionals should make all reasonable efforts to engage him and refer him to an appropriate perpetrator programme. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.3.3 |
Professionals need to consider with the mother the actions required prior to contacting the abusive partner to ensure her and the children's safety. Specifically, professionals should not tell him what the allegations are before having developed a safety plan for this with the mother and children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.3.4 |
If a professional addressing concerns with the abusive partner will put the mother and children at further risk, then the professional and the mother should plan for separation. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.3.5 |
See also section 17, Abusive Partners/Children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.1 |
If a mother wants separation, professionals need to ensure that there is sufficient support in place to enact this plan. Specifically, professionals should be aware that separation itself does not ensure safety, it often at least temporarily increases the risk to the child/ren or mother. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.2 |
The possibility of removing the abusive partner rather than the mother and child/ren should be considered first. See Appendix 7, Legal and Housing Options. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.3 |
The obstacles in the way of a mother leaving an abusive partner are the same as those which prevent mothers from disclosing the domestic violence in the first place - fears that the separation will be worse than the current situation or fatal. See section 6.1, Barriers to Disclosure for Mothers. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.4 |
Professionals need to be aware that separation may not be the best safety plan if the mother is not wholly committed to leaving, and in consequence may well return. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.5 |
Where a professional and a mother disagree about the need for separation, the professional's task is to convey to the mother that her reasons for wanting to stay are understood and appreciated. However, if the threshold of significant harm is reached (threshold scale 4) the professional must make a referral to LA children's social care in line with section 6, Referral and Assessment in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007) or call for a child protection conference or removal of the children - see section 8, Child Protection Conferences, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.6 |
Where the risk is assessed as being threshold scale 1 or 2:Key agencies which may be involved in the CAF and the safety planning are the school, health, LA housing, an advocacy service, the police community safety unit, Women's Aid or Refuge - as appropriate. A professional should be nominated to proactively engage with the mother and maintain contact, particularly immediately after separation. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.7 |
Professionals should keep the safety of the children constantly under review, re-assessing the risk of harm using the risk identification matrix in the light of any new information. If the risk of harm to the child/ren rises to scales 3 or 4, the lead professional must follow the procedures set out in section 9.5, Threshold and Interventions - Child Protection - including, as appropriate, contacting or making a referral to LA children's social care in line with section 6, Referral and Assessment in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.8 |
Mothers need to know from the outset that this process may need to be enacted. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.4.9 |
Where the risk is assessed as being threshold scale 3 or 4:LA children's social care should advise on or lead the safety planning. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.1 |
As soon as a professional becomes aware of domestic violence within a family, s/he should use the pro forma in Appendix 9, Safety Planning with Children and Young People to work with the mother and each child, according to their age and understanding (Note: For a definition of 'Fraser competency' see section 5.3 of the London procedure for safeguarding sexually active children [London Board, 2005]), to develop a safety plan. If a safety plan already exists, it should be reviewed. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.2 |
The plan should emphasise that the best thing a child can do for themselves and their mother is not to try to intervene but to keep safe and, where appropriate, to get away and seek help. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.3 |
The child/ren should be given several telephone numbers, including local police community safety units, local domestic violence advocacy services (please refer to locally produced information), LA children's social care, the Childline number (0800 1111), and the NSPCC Child Protection Helpline (0808 800 5000). |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.4 |
When the mother's safety plan involves separation from the abusive partner, the disruption and difficulties for the child/ren need to be considered and addressed. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.5 |
Maintaining and strengthening the mother / child relationship is in most cases key to helping the child to survive and recover from the impact of the violence and abuse. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.6 |
The child/ren will need a long term support plan, with the support ranging from mentoring and support to integrate into a new locality and school / nursery school or attend clubs and other leisure / play activities through to therapeutic services and group work to enable the child to share their experiences. |
||||||||||||||||||||
14.5.7 |
Professionals should ensure that in planning for the longer term support needs of the child/ren at all levels, input is received from the full range of key agencies (e.g. the school, health, LA housing, an advocacy service, the police community safety unit, Women's Aid or Refuge, relevant local activity groups and/or therapeutic services). |
||||||||||||||||||||
15. |
Contact (LA children's social care, specialist agencies and CAFCASS) |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.1 |
Many women, despite a decision to separate, believe that it is in the child/ren's interest to see their father. Others are compelled by the courts to allow contact. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.2 |
Mothers can be most vulnerable to serious violent assault in the period after separation. Contact can be a mechanism for the abusive partner to locate the mother and children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.3 |
Children can also be vulnerable to violent assault as a means of hurting their mother. Men who abuse their partners may use contact with the child/ren to hurt the mother by, for example, verbally abusing the mother to the children or blaming her for the separation. Thus, through contact the child/ren can be exposed to further physical and/or emotional and psychological harm. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.4 |
Professionals supporting separation plans should consider at an early point the mother's views regarding post-separation contact. The professional should clearly outline for the mother the factors which need to be considered to judge that contact is in the child's best interests. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.5 |
Professionals should also speak with and listen to each child regarding post-separation contact. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.6 |
Professionals should complete an assessment of the risks from contact to the mother and child/ren. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.7 |
Where the assessment concludes that there is a risk of harm, the professional must recommend that no unsupervised contact should occur until a fuller risk assessment has been undertaken by an agency with expertise in working with men who abuse their partners. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.8 |
Professionals should advise mothers of their legal rights if an abusive partner makes a private law application for contact. This should include the option of asking for a referral to the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) Safe Contact Project. See CAFCASS website |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.9 |
If there is an assessment that unsupervised contact or contact of any kind should not occur, professionals should ensure that this opinion is brought to the attention of any court hearing applications for contact. |
||||||||||||||||||||
15.10 |
Professionals should ensure that any supervised contact is safe for the mother and the child/ren, and reviewed regularly. The child/ren's views should be sought as part of this review process. |
||||||||||||||||||||
16. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
See also appendix 2, Forced marriage of a Child and Honour-Based Violence, and the London procedure for Safeguarding Sexually Active Children (London Board, 2006). |
||||||||||||||||||||
16.1 |
Young women in the 16 to 24 age group are most at risk of being victims of domestic violence. Whilst they are under the age of 18 years, these young women (in some cases teenage mothers) should receive support and safeguarding in line with the Children Act 1989 and Children Act 2004. |
||||||||||||||||||||
16.2 |
For young women aged 18 to 24 years, professionals should follow their local Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) procedure. (Note: Each local authority will have their own procedure for the protection of vulnerable adults. For a generic summary of the contents see the London Safeguarding Children Board website) |
||||||||||||||||||||
16.3 |
Professionals who come into contact with young people (teachers, school nurses, sexual health professionals, GP's etc.) should be aware of the possibility that the young person could be experiencing violence within their relationship. |
||||||||||||||||||||
16.4 |
Professionals with concerns that a young woman / teenage mother is being abused within a relationship should follow this procedure, adapting it to focus on the circumstances and locations in which the young woman / mother meets her partner (e.g. choosing safer venues, locations and peer groups to meet, being able to identify trigger points which lead to violence and practicing safe ways to leave and go home etc.). |
||||||||||||||||||||
17. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Professionals responding to abusive partners or children should act in accordance with the severity of the violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
See also section 7.2, Enabling Disclosure for an Abusive Partner and Appendix 10, Working with Abusive Partners. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.1 |
The primary aim of work with men who abuse their partners is to increase the safety of children and their mothers. A secondary aim is to hold the abusive partner accountable for his violence and provide him with opportunities to change. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.2 |
Men who abuse their partners will seek to control any contact a professional makes with them or work undertaken with them. Most abusive partners will do everything they can to avoid taking responsibility for their abusive behaviour towards their partner and their child/ren. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.3 |
Where an abusive partner is willing to acknowledge his violent behaviour and seeks help to change, this should be encouraged and affirmed. Such men should be referred to appropriate programmes which work to address the cognitive structures that underpin controlling behaviours. Professionals should avoid referring for anger management, as this approach does not challenge the factors that underpin the abusive partner's use of power and control. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.4 |
When a mother leaves a violent situation, the abusive partner must never be given the address or phone number of where she is staying |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.5 |
Professionals should never agree to accept a letter or pass on a message from an abusive partner unless the mother has requested this. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.6 |
Joint work between an abusive partner and a mother should only be considered where the abusive partner has completed an assessment with an appropriate specialist agency. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.1.7 |
Men who abuse their partners should be invited to joint meetings with the mother only where it is assessed that it is safe for this to occur. See section 8.6.1, Exclusion of Family Members from a Conference, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
17.2.1 |
Children and young people of both genders can direct violence or abuse towards their parents or siblings. The hostile behaviour of children who abuse in this way may have its roots in early emotional harm, for which the child will need support and treatment. |
||||||||||||||||||||
17.2.2 |
Professionals should refer a child who abuses to LA children's social care in line with section 6, Referral and Assessment, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). In responding to children who harm, professionals should follow the procedures in section 5.20, Harming Others, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
18. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
This section must be read in conjunction with section 10, Working with Unco-operative Families , in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
18.1.1 |
Professionals are at risk whenever they work with a family where one or more family members are violent. |
||||||||||||||||||||
18.1.2 |
Professionals should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
18.1.3 |
Managers should ensure that professionals have the appropriate training and skills for working with children and their families experiencing domestic violence; and use supervision sessions both to allow a professional to voice fears about violence in a family being directed at them; and also to check that safe practice is being followed in all cases where domestic violence is known or suspected. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Appendix 1: Risk identification matrixPlease click here to view Risk Identification Matrix.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.15 |
Forced marriage of a child |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.1 |
A 'forced' marriage, as distinct from a consensual 'arranged' one, is a marriage conducted without the valid consent of both parties and where duress is a factor. Duress cannot be justified on religious or cultural grounds. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.2 |
In 2004, the Government's definition of domestic violence was extended to include acts perpetrated by extended family members as well as intimate partners. Consequently, acts such as forced marriage and so-called 'honour crimes' (which can include abduction and homicide) now come under the definition of domestic violence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.3 |
A child who is being forced into marriage is at risk of Significant Harm through physical, sexual and Emotional Abuse. See section 4.3, Recognition of Abuse and Neglect, London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). Significant harm is defined in section 4, Recognition and Response, London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007) as a situation where a child is suffering, or is likely to suffer, a degree of physical, sexual and / or emotional harm (through abuse or neglect), which is so harmful that there needs to be compulsory intervention by child protection agencies into the life of the child and their family. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.4 |
Forced marriages encountered in the UK have involved families from South Asia, East Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa. The reasons given by parents who force their children to marry include protecting their children, building stronger families and preserving cultural or religious traditions. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.5 |
While there is a presumption that parents want the best for their children, this may result in conflict between their wishes and those of the child. Where parents force their children to marry, the justification for their actions often falls within the following:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.6 |
Information about a forced marriage may come from the child themselves, one of the child's peer group, a relative or member of the child's local community, or from another professional. Forced marriage may also become apparent when other family issues are addressed, such as domestic violence, self-harm, child abuse or neglect, family / young person conflict, a child not attending school or a missing child / runaway. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.7 |
Situations where a child fears being forced into marriage have similarities with both domestic violence and honour based violence. Forced marriage may involve the child being taken out of the country for the ceremony, is likely to involve non-consensual and/or underage sex, and refusal to go through with a forced marriage has sometimes been linked to so-called 'honour killing'. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.8 |
Professionals should respond in a similar way to forced marriage as with domestic violence and honour based violence (i.e. in facilitating disclosure, developing individual safety plans, ensuring the child's safety by according them confidentiality in relation to the rest of the family, completing individual risk assessments etc.). See section 5, Children in Specific Circumstances, section 5.12, Domestic Violence and section 5.22, Honour Based Violence, London Child Protection Procedures, (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.9 |
The needs of victims of forced marriage will vary widely. The child may need help avoiding a threatened forced marriage, or help dealing with the consequences of a forced marriage that has already taken place. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.10 |
Where an allegation of forced marriage or intended forced marriage is raised, the professional should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.11 |
Professionals should not:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.12 |
If a professional and their agency's nominated safeguarding children adviser conclude that the child is at risk of harm, the professional should make a referral to LA children's social care in line with section 6, Referral and Assessment in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007) and, if the situation is acute, the appropriate police child abuse investigation team (CAIT). See also section 6.4, Referral Criteria and the indicator table in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007), which provides guidance on the difference in LA children's social care between s47 / core assessment and an initial assessment. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.15.13 | When dealing with allegations of forced marriage, all professionals should:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.14 |
LA children's social care should respond in line with the relevant sections of these procedures (see section 6, Referral and Assessment, in the London Child Protection Procedures, London Board, 2007, including section 6.4, Referral Criteria and the indicator table which provides guidance on the difference in LA children's social care between s47 / core assessment and an initial assessment). In an acute situation, LA children's social care should convene an immediate strategy meeting / discussion and proceed accordingly. See section 7, Child Protection Enquiries, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.15 |
The situations, and the appropriate LA children's social care responses, are set out in government guidelines for responding to forced marriage situations, in the following five sections.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.16 |
Government guidelines for responding to forced marriage situations are available: |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.17 |
The Association of Chief Police Officers of England Wales and Northern Ireland (ACPO) guidelines for the police for responding to forced marriage situations are available: Click here to view 'Dealing with Cases of Forced Marriage' Guidance for Police Officers Local agencies and professionals can contact the Forced Marriage Unit where experienced caseworkers will be able to offer support and guidance on: 020 7008 0151 or online at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office website |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.18 |
LA children's social care should report details of the case, with full family history, to the Community Liaison Unit at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.15.19 |
Local Safeguarding Children Boards should promote awareness in the local community, voluntary agencies and faith communities that forced marriage is abusive to children and not legal in the UK. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.1 |
Honour based violence is the term used to describe murders in the name of so-called honour, sometimes called 'honour killings'. These are murders in which predominantly women are killed for perceived immoral behaviour, which is deemed to have breached the honour code of a family or community, causing shame. The Metropolitan Police definition of so-called honour based violence is: 'a crime or incident, which has or may been committed to protect or defend the honour of the family and/or community'. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.2 |
Professionals should respond in a similar way to cases of honour violence as with domestic violence and forced marriage (i.e. in facilitating disclosure, developing individual safety plans, ensuring the child's safety by according them confidentiality in relation to the rest of the family, completing individual risk assessments etc.). See section 5, Children in Specific Circumstances, section 5.12, Domestic Violence and section 5.16, Forced Marriage of a Child in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.3 |
A child who is at risk of honour based violence is at significant risk of physical harm (including being murdered) and/or neglect, and may also suffer significant emotional harm through the threat of violence or witnessing violence directed towards a sibling or other family member. See section 4, Recognition and Response, section 4.3 Recognition of Abuse and Neglect in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). Significant harm is defined in section 4, Recognition and Response of the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007) as a situation where a child is likely to suffer a degree of physical harm which is such that it requires a compulsory intervention by child protection agencies into the life of the child and their family. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.4 |
Honour based violence cuts across all cultures and communities, and cases encountered in the UK have involved families from Turkish, Kurdish, Afghani, South Asian, African, Middle Eastern, South and Eastern European communities. This is not an exhaustive list. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.5 |
The perceived immoral behaviour which could precipitate a murder include:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.6 |
Murders in the name of 'so-called honour' are often the culmination of a series of events over a period of time and are planned. There tends to be a degree of premeditation, family conspiracy and a belief that the victim deserved to die. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.7 |
Incidents, in addition to those listed in 5.20.5 above, which may precede a murder include:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.8 |
Children sometimes truant from school to obtain relief from being policed at home by relatives. They can feel isolated from their family and social networks and become depressed, which can on some occasions lead to self-harm or suicide. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.9 |
Families may feel shame long after the incident that brought about dishonour occurred, and therefore the risk of harm to a child can persist. This means that the young person's new boy/girlfriend, baby (if pregnancy caused the family to feel 'shame'), associates or siblings may be at risk of harm. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.10 |
When receiving a disclosure from a child, professionals should recognise the seriousness / immediacy of the risk of harm. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.11 |
For a child to report to any agency that they have fears of honour based violence in respect of themselves or a family member requires a lot of courage, and trust that the professional / agency they disclose to will respond appropriately. Specifically, under no circumstances should the agency allow the child's family or social network to find out about the disclosure, so as not to put the child at further risk of harm. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.12 |
Authorities in some countries may support the practice of honour-based violence, and the child may be concerned that other agencies share this view, or that they will be returned to their family. The child may be carrying guilt about their rejection of cultural / family expectations. Furthermore, their immigration status may be dependent on their family, which could be used to dissuade them from seeking assistance. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.13 |
Where a child discloses fear of honour based violence, professionals in all agencies should respond in line with section 5, Children in Specific Circumstances, section 5.12, Domestic Violence and section 5.16, Forced Marriage of a Child in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007); and this supplementary London procedure for safeguarding children abused through domestic violence (London Board, 2007). The professional response should include:
See also section 6.4 Referral criteria and the indicator table, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007), which provides guidance on the difference in LA children's social care between s47 / Core Assessment and an initial assessment. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.14 |
LA children's social care should incorporate into their initial and core assessments the safety planning, self-assessment and risk assessment processes in the London procedure for safeguarding children abused through domestic violence (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.15 |
Professionals should not approach the family or community leaders, share any information with them or attempt any form of mediation. In particular, members of the local community should not be used as interpreters. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.16 |
All multi-agency discussions should recognise the police responsibility to initiate and undertake a criminal investigation as appropriate. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.17 |
Multi-agency planning should consider the need for providing suitable safe accommodation for the child, as appropriate. |
||||||||||||||||||||
5.20.18 |
If a child is taken abroad, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office may assist in repatriating them to the UK. See also section 5, Children in Specific Circumstances, section 5.48, Accessing Information from Abroad, in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Types and frequency of exposure to domestic violence |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
2. |
Risks posed by the domestic violence |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
3. |
Impact of exposure to domestic violence |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
4. |
Protective factors |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Appendix 6: Multi-agency Risk Assessment Conferencing (MARAC)Extract from the section 13, Risk Management of Known Offenders, London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007), section 13.4, Adult Offenders. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-agency risk assessment conferencing (MARAC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.19 |
Multi-agency risk assessment conferencing (MARAC), which was developed in South Wales, has been introduced into a number of boroughs to identify victims of domestic abuse who are most at risk of experiencing violence in the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.20 |
The key element of MARAC is the risk assessment, which will be carried out by police officers attending incidents of domestic abuse. |
||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.21 |
The risk assessment has three main objectives:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.22 |
Information gathered during these risk assessments will then be shared among relevant agencies to promote the safety of abused women and their children. |
||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.23 |
To hold a MARAC requires, at a minimum, that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.24 |
Additionally, it is expected that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
13.4.25 |
The following agencies will always be invited to a MARAC: police, LA children's social care, probation, health, LA education (where relevant). Other statutory or voluntary agencies may also be invited. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Appendix 7: Legal and housing optionsPractitioners should inform mothers of these options, but should also always refer mothers to specialist advice services, such as CAB, a Law Centre, Women's Aid or Independent Domestic Violence Advisors. Please note that this list is not an exhaustive one and professionals should contact their borough domestic violence co-ordinators for a local list of specialist agencies. Domestic violence is a crime under both civil and criminal law. The legislation is summarised below. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Civil action |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 |
Family Law Act 1996 Part IV |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1.1 |
The Act provides for a single set of remedies to deal with domestic violence and to regulate occupation of the family home, through two specific types of order, the non-molestation order and the occupation order. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2 |
Non-molestation orders / injunctions |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2.1 |
It is possible to take out an injunction against anyone: e.g. father, husband, son, gay partner, other family member or other household member. An order can prohibit a perpetrator from molesting any named person including any children. The molestation can take the form of physical violence but can also include other forms of violence and harassment. It can include specific injunctions such as instructing a perpetrator to stay away from the home. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.3 |
Occupation orders |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.3.1 |
This may take a number of forms (e.g. enforcing the women's right to remain in the home or restricting the perpetrator's right to occupy it, even if he is a tenant or owner occupier). The court has power to order someone to live only in a certain part of the house or to allow someone back into the house, etc. The court has wide powers to order someone not to surrender a tenancy or remove or destroy the contents of the home. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.3.2 |
In most cases such orders are made for short periods of time and do not affect long term rights in the property. In the longer term an application can be made to the court for a tenancy to be transferred. An order may be for a specified period, usually six months, or for open-ended period or until a different order is made if further provisions are needed. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.3.3 |
Anyone who is a person who is associated with the respondent may apply for an order and an application may be made on behalf of a relevant child. Associated persons are people who:
This list is not exhaustive. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.4 |
Power of arrest |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.4.1 |
In order to provide better protection, the powers of arrest in relation to the above orders have been strengthened. Where the court makes an occupation or non-molestation order and it appears to the court that the abuser has used or threatened to use violence against the applicant or a relevant child, the court must attach a power of arrest unless it is satisfied that the applicant or child will be adequately protected without such a power. If a power of arrest is attached a person in breach of the order may be arrested without a warrant. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.5 |
Court procedure and privacy |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.5.1 |
The woman can be reassured that the court process takes place in a private room at the court, which is not open to members of the public. The woman's solicitor will prepare a written statement for her to sign in support of her application for an injunction and/or occupation order. The woman will need to attend court when her application is heard. The woman's solicitor or barrister will put her case to the judge. Getting an injunction will involve at least one court hearing. Unlike a criminal case, there is no obligation on the opponent to attend - if he does not turn up, an order will be made in his absence. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.5.2 |
In a dire emergency and/or if it is not safe to give the man prior warning of the application to the court, a court hearing will go ahead without notice to the opponent. Usually an order is granted to the woman. Sometimes the order will provide temporary protection until a further hearing of which the opponent has notice. Otherwise applications are made and the opponent is given prior notice of the court hearing. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.6 |
Standard of proof |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.6.1 |
The standard of proof is lower than in a criminal case. The court has to decide whether the allegations of violence are true on the balance of probabilities (in a criminal case, it must be beyond reasonable doubt.) In some cases, perpetrators do not even go to court or contest cases, so evidence such as reports to the police may not be required. However, if the perpetrator does fight the case, it helps if there is medical evidence and incidents have been reported to the police or witnessed by others. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.7 |
Housing Acts 1985 and 1996 |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.7.1 |
Under Ground 1 Schedule 2 of the Housing Act 1985, a possession order can be granted where an obligation of the tenancy has been broken or not performed. Tenancy agreements should have a clause such as the following, which can be used in relation to domestic violence: 'you or any member of your family must not use or threaten to use violence by using physical, mental, emotional or sexual abuse against anyone legally entitled to live either in your home or in another of our properties' (Note: City West Homes Tenancy Agreement) |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.7.2 |
The Housing Act 1996 added Ground 2A of Schedule 2 to the Housing Act 1985. Under the Act, possession action can be taken against a remaining tenant where their partner has left the family home because of violence or threats of violence and does not intend to return. This ground can be considered when the partner (whether or not they are a tenant) has been rehoused because of violence and the perpetrator is left in occupation (particularly as they may be under-occupying a family sized unit). |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.7.3 |
In such cases, sufficient evidence of violence having occurred is required, which can include evidence provided by any professional the survivor is working with. In addition, housing authorities can take injunctive action against a tenant if he is in breach of the terms of his tenancy agreement. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.7.4 |
Other anti-social behaviour legislation also allows housing powers to act against perpetrators in respect of their tenancies. Practitioners should always seek advice from housing services when considering what options are available to the woman in securing protection for herself and the children. It is good practice to invite housing to meetings arranged to draw up safety plans around women. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 |
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) officers are under a duty to take positive action when investigating domestic violence offences. There is an expectation that a domestic violence perpetrator will be arrested in all criminal investigations where there are reasonable grounds to suspect a crime has taken place. Where a criminal offence has not been disclosed it should be noted that an arrest generally cannot be made. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.2 |
The power to arrest comes from Section 110 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, which amended the powers of arrest available to a constable under section 24 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. This has made all offences potentially arrestable in certain circumstances. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.3 |
The exercise of arrest powers will be subject to a test of necessity based around the nature and circumstances of the offence and the interests of the criminal justice system. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.4 |
An arrest will only be justified if the constable believes it is necessary for any of the reasons set out below: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
2.5 |
When considering the need to arrest, the officer should take the following into account;
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.6 |
The CSUs in the majority of cases will be the primary unit to investigate domestic violence offences. The decision to caution for a domestic violence offence lies with either the police or the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). If a police officer decides to caution a domestic violence perpetrator, they must be at least a substantive Inspector. The MPS guidance is that the officer making the cautioning decision should not be involved in the investigation for both subjectivity and integrity reasons. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.7 |
It is the role of the CPS to decide on whether a perpetrator should be charged with a criminal offence and what criminal offence(s) should be charged. If there is a disagreement between police and CPS, there is a dispute resolution process to review charging decisions - although ultimately it is the CPS who have the final decision. |
||||||||||||||||||||
2.8 |
The typical offences (though this is not exhaustive) likely to be charged in domestic violence cases are: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
2.9 |
Once charged and at court there are numerous orders that can be applied for post sentence (NB. some can be applied for as stand alone orders, though the process is more difficult) to manage the future behaviour of an offender. These include:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.10 |
It should also be noted that if offenders are classed as: - violent offenders; or potentially dangerous; or convicted of sexual offences and have to register as registered sex offenders (RSO) on the Sexual Offences Register; they will be managed by the MAPPA (Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements). Further information can be obtained from the MPS' Operation Jigsaw teams located on every borough. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Victims of domestic violence need to consider their housing options for both the short and longer term. If a woman feels she is unable to remain at the family home at least temporarily, the following options could be considered. Note the options of removing the perpetrator as outlined above should always be made known to the woman. Independent Domestic Violence Advisors are a good source of advice and support regarding housing options. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 |
The Sanctuary Project |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.1 |
The Sanctuary Project supports victims of domestic violence who are at risk of becoming homeless due to domestic violence from a current or former spouse, partner or close family member. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.2 |
The Sanctuary Project offers victims of domestic violence the option to remain safely and securely in their homes, through the installation of free, tailored home security. Every Sanctuary is tailored to the needs and circumstances of the individual and property involved. Police Crime Prevention Officers visit the home and will recommend appropriate security measures, which is then completed by a private contractor. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.2 |
Refuges |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.1 |
Refuges provide safe, emergency temporary accommodation for women and children who need protection from abuse. The workers in the refuges can provide information, advice and support. They can give practical assistance with benefit claims, court appearance etc. However, facilities such as kitchens, bathrooms, and sitting rooms are shared and many refuges will not accept women with boys aged 12 or over. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.2 |
The 24 hour national domestic violence helpline (0808 2000 247) is run in partnership by Refuge and Women's Aid. As well as providing general advice and support, these agencies refer women to refuges in London or around the country, or advise on other possibilities if refuges are full. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.3 |
Staying with family and friends |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.1 |
Depending on the circumstances, this may be an appropriate short term option. The victim may get more support and it is quick and cheap. However, it may also mean that she is easy for the abuser to find. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.4 |
Making a homelessness application |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.1 |
The housing options service will decide whether it is reasonable to expect a victim of domestic violence to continue to occupy their present accommodation, whether the victim is in priority need and whether the local authority has a duty to provide temporary accommodation. Each case will be assessed on an individual basis. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.2 |
The local authority may offer temporary accommodation while the case is being investigated. If the local authority then decides that the victim is homeless, has a priority need and there is a duty, self-contained stage 2 accommodation may be offered. However, in many cases this may be out of the borough. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.3 |
Waiting times in temporary accommodation are lengthy. It may be over two years before an offer of permanent family sized accommodation can be made. It is therefore important to try and get as much information as possible about the situation. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.4.4 |
To prevent victims of domestic violence being asked to visit housing options immediately, a senior case worker can be contacted and details of the case given. A homeless application can be completed and faxed to the caseworker. However, if there is an immediate threat of violence, an appointment must be made with the assessment team that day. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.5 |
Management transfers |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.5.1 |
A management transfer may be an option if the woman is a sole tenant and the perpetrator lives elsewhere. Each case will need to be considered on an individual basis. Advice about legal remedies and specialist support agencies, as outlined above, should be given to enable the woman to take any necessary steps to protect herself and her family while she is waiting for a transfer (it must be noted that the target for rehousing management transfer cases is 12 weeks). |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.6 |
Out of London |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.6.1 |
If a sole tenant is experiencing domestic violence and wishes to move out of the borough, it may be possible to nominate to another council or housing association. It may be possible to offer permanent rehousing quickly out of the area. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.7 |
Homes Scheme |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.7.1 |
Realistically, the number of nominations to other London boroughs is limited as they are stretched in terms of their housing stock. It is therefore only those in the greatest need who will be nominated. The demand for family size units is great so there is more chance for those seeking bedsit or one bedroom accommodation |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Professionals need to ensure that they have a firm understanding of issues around families with no recourse to public funds and how they can work with these victims, especially in relation to access to Legal Aid and Housing. Professionals may wish to consult the Tower Hamlets Domestic Violence Team's No Recourse Guidance, which is available at the London Safeguarding Children Board website |
|||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 |
Domestic violence and the two year rule |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.1 |
People from abroad who enter or stay in the UK on the basis of marriage or relationship to a spouse/partner who is settled in the UK or is a British citizen are initially given limited leave to remain. They are subjected to a probationary period, at the end of which, with the support of their spouse or partner who is settled in UK, they can apply for indefinite leave to remain. This probationary period was extended to two years in 2003. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.2 |
During the two year period, the partner from abroad is restricted from recourse to public funds. If the relationship breaks down, the partner from abroad becomes liable to be removed from the UK unless they can show the required evidence of domestic violence under the domestic violence concession to the rule. Fear that they will be deported is a factor that may inhibit women in such situations disclosing. Perpetrators often use this fear as a tool of control. |
||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.3 |
In such situations, practitioners should seek advice from support agencies as to any women's eligibility to apply under the domestic violence concessions to the rule. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Appendix 8: Safety planning with women(Note: Adapted from the Stella Project's Domestic Violence, Drugs and Alcohol Toolkit) By raising the issue of domestic violence, we create opportunities to explore ways in which women and children can be safe. A safety plan is a semi-structured way to think about steps that can be taken to reduce risk, before, during and after any violent or abusive incidents. It is important to stress that although a safety plan can reduce the risks of violence they cannot completely guarantee women and children's safety. Women should not keep the safety plan where it may be discovered by the abusive partner.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Appendix 9: Safety planning with children and young peopleFor a definition of 'Fraser competency' see Section 5.5 of the London procedure for safeguarding sexually active children (London Board, 2005). For additional guidance in dealing with situations where forced marriage may be an issue, see section 5.16. Forced marriage in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Appendix 10: Working with abusive partnersSee also section 10, Working with Unco-operative Families , in the London Child Protection Procedures (London Board, 2007). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Asking questions |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 |
Practitioner's responses to any disclosure, however indirect, could be significant for encouraging responsibility and motivating a man towards change. |
||||||||||||||||||||
1.2 |
If the man presents with a problem such as drinking, stress or depression, for example, but does not refer to his abusive behaviour, these are useful questions to ask:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
1.3 |
If a man responds openly to these prompting questions, more direct questions relating to heightened risk factors may be appropriate:
The information you gather will be the basis for your decision about how best to engage and what kind of specialist help is required - either for the man or to manage risk. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 |
Practitioners can make a difference and influence a family's situation and a child's well being, by following good practice response guidance, such as:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
3.1 |
Where the mother is indicating she wishes the abusive partner to be involved in her and the child's life, he should be referred to an appropriate perpetrator programme. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.2 |
When the abusive partner indicates that he is worried about his behaviour, and is ready to take responsibility for his need to change, it may be appropriate to start to discuss plans for keeping his partner safe from his abusive behaviour, prior to work on the programme beginning. This might occur in situations where there is likely to be a delay in starting such work; it should only be undertaken after consultation with the agency offering the perpetrator programme. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.3 |
Additionally, before undertaking any safety planning / risk management work with an abusive partner, professionals should ensure that the mother is aware of what is being proposed, and that there is confidence that such work will not compromise her safety. |
||||||||||||||||||||
3.4 |
Abusers should be referred to programmes accredited by Respect (see the Respect website). Abuser programmes should always be integrated with associated women's services and with specialist child protection services. Abusive partners may also be referred to specialist child protection services (e.g. working with children subject of child protection plans and their families. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Adapted from the Westminster Domestic Violence forum guidelines for working with perpetrators of domestic violence. The full version of this guidance is available on the WIRE. |
|||||||||||||||||||||





